What question do you believe is unanswerable?
Posted on Oct 13th, 2007
by
goodsoul
This is in Response to the Questions and Reflections for October 13, 2007:
Why?
No, really. That's the question, "Why?"
Who? What? When? Where? How? One or all of these characterize any question one might ask, and the answer to each is more or less discernable. A simple example will clarify.
I can ask and likely get a more or less correct answer to any of the following:
If I ask, "Why do bad things happen to good people?" I will never get a correct answer because there is no correct answer. Even a specific context will be reduced to the who, what, when, where and how.
Even in physics, the "why" of something is always premised on postulation, stipulation and empirical observation. Why does one plus one equal two? We all agreed on the construct and underlying principals of arithmetic. We might say we have faith in the correctness of that construct for purpose of generalization; but if we exceed the scale of our model, such generalizations fail. For example, what is one infinity plus one infinity. Arithmetically, the answer falls outside of the scope of arithmetic. Why? Becasue that's the way it is. :)
When dealing with spiritual questions, I contend the question is not "What?" God is, but "Why?" God is." Then we can stop debating which religion or belief system is more worthy and focus on understanding spiritual principals. But that is well beyond the scope of this reponse, and even then, we can not answer "Why?" God is.
Consider this: given the notion of an omnipresent, omnipotent entity we might call "God" we would be hard pressed to contend that there was anything that such an entity could not do. Question: "Can God get lost?"
Blezzings to all,
The Most Comical Ambazzador Goodsoul
No, really. That's the question, "Why?"
Who? What? When? Where? How? One or all of these characterize any question one might ask, and the answer to each is more or less discernable. A simple example will clarify.
I can ask and likely get a more or less correct answer to any of the following:
- "Who does bad things to good people?"
- "What bad things are done to good people?"
- "When was some bad thing done to a good person?"
- "Where was some bad thing done to a good person?"
- "How was some bad thing done to a good person?"
If I ask, "Why do bad things happen to good people?" I will never get a correct answer because there is no correct answer. Even a specific context will be reduced to the who, what, when, where and how.
Even in physics, the "why" of something is always premised on postulation, stipulation and empirical observation. Why does one plus one equal two? We all agreed on the construct and underlying principals of arithmetic. We might say we have faith in the correctness of that construct for purpose of generalization; but if we exceed the scale of our model, such generalizations fail. For example, what is one infinity plus one infinity. Arithmetically, the answer falls outside of the scope of arithmetic. Why? Becasue that's the way it is. :)
When dealing with spiritual questions, I contend the question is not "What?" God is, but "Why?" God is." Then we can stop debating which religion or belief system is more worthy and focus on understanding spiritual principals. But that is well beyond the scope of this reponse, and even then, we can not answer "Why?" God is.
Consider this: given the notion of an omnipresent, omnipotent entity we might call "God" we would be hard pressed to contend that there was anything that such an entity could not do. Question: "Can God get lost?"
Blezzings to all,
The Most Comical Ambazzador Goodsoul

Help



